Mongolia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Mongolia
2,214 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,418 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
4th
Zambia rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zambia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 2,214 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,418 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 796 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 6th of 145 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,807 real chained 2019 US$ 1,680 real chained 2019 US$ 2,127 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia
2000s 3,392 real chained 2019 US$ 2,055 real chained 2019 US$ 1,336 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia
2010s 2,717 real chained 2019 US$ 1,597 real chained 2019 US$ 1,120 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia
2020s 2,214 real chained 2019 US$ 1,418 real chained 2019 US$ 795.93 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Mongolia or Zambia?
Mongolia, at 2,214 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,418 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Mongolia and Zambia?
796 real chained 2019 US$, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Mongolia ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 6th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/mongolia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/mongolia/zambia/">Mongolia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed