Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Mexico
373.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
411.62 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
14th
Papua New Guinea rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Mexico
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 411.62 real chained 2019 US$ against 373.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico, a difference of 37.65 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 14th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 145 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 143.22 real chained 2019 US$ 1,410 real chained 2019 US$ 1,267 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 250.76 real chained 2019 US$ 914.07 real chained 2019 US$ 663.31 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 323.37 real chained 2019 US$ 525.38 real chained 2019 US$ 202.01 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 373.97 real chained 2019 US$ 411.62 real chained 2019 US$ 37.65 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Mexico or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 411.62 real chained 2019 US$ against 373.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
37.65 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mexico and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Mexico ranks 14th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/papua-new-guinea/">Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed