Mauritania vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Mauritania
288.3 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
323.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mauritania rank
17th
Serbia rank
15th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Mauritania
  • Serbia
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 323.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 288.3 real chained 2019 US$ in Mauritania, a difference of 34.93 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 15th of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 506.08 real chained 2019 US$ 346.17 real chained 2019 US$ 159.91 real chained 2019 US$ Mauritania
2010s 374.95 real chained 2019 US$ 337.16 real chained 2019 US$ 37.8 real chained 2019 US$ Mauritania
2020s 288.3 real chained 2019 US$ 323.23 real chained 2019 US$ 34.93 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Mauritania or Serbia?
Serbia, at 323.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 288.3 real chained 2019 US$ in Mauritania as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Mauritania and Serbia?
34.93 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Mauritania and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Mauritania ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 15th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/mauritania/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/mauritania/serbia/">Mauritania vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed