Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Kyrgyzstan
53.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
39.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
South Africa rank
33rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • South Africa
406080100120140199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 53.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 39.49 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 13.89 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.4 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 33rd of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 80.68 real chained 2019 US$ 124.25 real chained 2019 US$ 43.57 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 73.89 real chained 2019 US$ 86.37 real chained 2019 US$ 12.48 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 63.46 real chained 2019 US$ 52.08 real chained 2019 US$ 11.39 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 53.38 real chained 2019 US$ 39.49 real chained 2019 US$ 13.89 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
Kyrgyzstan, at 53.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 39.49 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
13.89 real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 33rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/south-africa/">Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed