Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Georgia
127.27 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
183.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
26th
Namibia rank
23rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Georgia
  • Namibia
150200250300350199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 183.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.27 real chained 2019 US$ in Georgia, a difference of 55.93 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Georgia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 26th and Namibia ranks 23rd of 145 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 145.64 real chained 2019 US$ 337.52 real chained 2019 US$ 191.88 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 148.85 real chained 2019 US$ 272 real chained 2019 US$ 123.15 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 136.81 real chained 2019 US$ 217.53 real chained 2019 US$ 80.72 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 127.27 real chained 2019 US$ 183.2 real chained 2019 US$ 55.93 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Georgia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 183.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.27 real chained 2019 US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Georgia and Namibia?
55.93 real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Georgia ranks 26th and Namibia ranks 23rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/namibia/">Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed