Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Colombia
5.93 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
17.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
40th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
102030199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Colombia, a difference of 11.27 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.9 times Colombia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 145 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 9.19 real chained 2019 US$ 30.4 real chained 2019 US$ 21.21 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 8 real chained 2019 US$ 26.69 real chained 2019 US$ 18.7 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 6.86 real chained 2019 US$ 21.34 real chained 2019 US$ 14.48 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 5.93 real chained 2019 US$ 17.2 real chained 2019 US$ 11.27 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Colombia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
11.27 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Colombia ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed