Australia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Australia
2,025 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Peru
2,552 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
5th
Peru rank
2nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Australia
  • Peru
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Peru currently reports 2,552 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,025 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 527 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and Peru ranks 2nd of 145 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 236.99 real chained 2019 US$ 513.02 real chained 2019 US$ 276.04 real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2000s 808.85 real chained 2019 US$ 1,365 real chained 2019 US$ 556.62 real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2010s 2,195 real chained 2019 US$ 2,378 real chained 2019 US$ 182.47 real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2020s 2,025 real chained 2019 US$ 2,552 real chained 2019 US$ 527.3 real chained 2019 US$ Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Australia or Peru?
Peru, at 2,552 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,025 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Australia and Peru?
527 real chained 2019 US$, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Australia ranks 5th and Peru ranks 2nd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/australia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/australia/peru/">Australia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed