Australia vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Australia
2,025 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
2,327 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
5th
Kazakhstan rank
3rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 2,327 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,025 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 302 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 3rd of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 236.99 real chained 2019 US$ 1,992 real chained 2019 US$ 1,755 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2000s 808.85 real chained 2019 US$ 2,173 real chained 2019 US$ 1,364 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2010s 2,195 real chained 2019 US$ 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ 957.44 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2020s 2,025 real chained 2019 US$ 2,327 real chained 2019 US$ 301.87 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 2,327 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,025 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Australia and Kazakhstan?
302 real chained 2019 US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Australia ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 3rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed