Spain vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper
Spain
49.47 current US$
in 2020
Tajikistan
59.95 current US$
in 2020
Spain rank
33rd
Tajikistan rank
31st
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time
- Spain
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 59.95 current US$ against 49.47 current US$ in Spain, a difference of 10.48 current US$.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 33rd and Tajikistan ranks 31st of 55 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 102.2 current US$ | 20.31 current US$ | 81.89 current US$ | Spain |
| 2020s | 49.47 current US$ | 59.95 current US$ | 10.48 current US$ | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Spain or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 59.95 current US$ against 49.47 current US$ in Spain as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Spain and Tajikistan?
- 10.48 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Tajikistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Spain and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
- Spain ranks 33rd and Tajikistan ranks 31st of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.