South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

South Africa
30.03 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
28.83 current US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
050100150199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 30.03 current US$ against 28.83 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.2 current US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 55 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 62.57 current US$ 10.5 current US$ 52.06 current US$ South Africa
2000s 65.76 current US$ 9.03 current US$ 56.74 current US$ South Africa
2010s 87.72 current US$ 21.09 current US$ 66.63 current US$ South Africa
2020s 30.03 current US$ 28.83 current US$ 1.19 current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 30.03 current US$ against 28.83 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
1.2 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
South Africa ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed