Serbia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper
Serbia
445.89 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
411.61 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
11th
Sweden rank
14th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time
- Serbia
- Sweden
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 445.89 current US$ against 411.61 current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 34.28 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Sweden ahead.
Serbia ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 14th of 55 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.66 current US$ | 433.16 current US$ | 349.51 current US$ | Sweden |
| 2010s | 383.77 current US$ | 411.82 current US$ | 28.05 current US$ | Sweden |
| 2020s | 445.89 current US$ | 411.61 current US$ | 34.29 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Serbia or Sweden?
- Serbia, at 445.89 current US$ against 411.61 current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Serbia and Sweden?
- 34.28 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Serbia and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
- Serbia ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 14th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.