Russian Federation vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Russian Federation
417.66 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
445.89 current US$
in 2020
Russian Federation rank
13th
Serbia rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Serbia
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 445.89 current US$ against 417.66 current US$ in Russian Federation, a difference of 28.23 current US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 11th of 55 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 299.87 current US$ 83.66 current US$ 216.21 current US$ Russian Federation
2010s 373.66 current US$ 383.77 current US$ 10.11 current US$ Serbia
2020s 417.66 current US$ 445.89 current US$ 28.23 current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Russian Federation or Serbia?
Serbia, at 445.89 current US$ against 417.66 current US$ in Russian Federation as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Russian Federation and Serbia?
28.23 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Russian Federation and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Russian Federation ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 11th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/russian-federation/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/russian-federation/serbia/">Russian Federation vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed