Papua New Guinea vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Papua New Guinea
293.69 current US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
417.66 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
16th
Russian Federation rank
13th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Russian Federation
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 417.66 current US$ against 293.69 current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 123.97 current US$.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 55 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 649 current US$ 92.66 current US$ 556.35 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1,009 current US$ 180.48 current US$ 828.17 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 633.3 current US$ 373.66 current US$ 259.64 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 293.69 current US$ 417.66 current US$ 123.98 current US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Papua New Guinea or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 417.66 current US$ against 293.69 current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation?
123.97 current US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Papua New Guinea ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/papua-new-guinea/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/papua-new-guinea/russian-federation/">Papua New Guinea vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed