Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Namibia
264.16 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
293.69 current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
19th
Papua New Guinea rank
16th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Namibia
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 293.69 current US$ against 264.16 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 29.53 current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Namibia ranks 19th and Papua New Guinea ranks 16th of 55 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 165.11 current US$ 743.58 current US$ 578.47 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 139.99 current US$ 1,001 current US$ 861.06 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 170.71 current US$ 524.48 current US$ 353.77 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 264.16 current US$ 293.69 current US$ 29.53 current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Namibia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 293.69 current US$ against 264.16 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Namibia and Papua New Guinea?
29.53 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Papua New Guinea?
23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Namibia ranks 19th and Papua New Guinea ranks 16th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/namibia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/namibia/papua-new-guinea/">Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed