Mexico vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Mexico
265.77 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
264.16 current US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
18th
Namibia rank
19th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Mexico
  • Namibia
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 265.77 current US$ against 264.16 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 1.61 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Mexico ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 19th of 55 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 76.48 current US$ 165.11 current US$ 88.63 current US$ Namibia
2000s 136.95 current US$ 139.99 current US$ 3.04 current US$ Namibia
2010s 323.13 current US$ 170.71 current US$ 152.41 current US$ Mexico
2020s 265.77 current US$ 264.16 current US$ 1.62 current US$ Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Mexico or Namibia?
Mexico, at 265.77 current US$ against 264.16 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Mexico and Namibia?
1.61 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Namibia?
23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mexico and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Mexico ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 19th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/mexico/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/mexico/namibia/">Mexico vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed