Mauritania vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Mauritania
396.54 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
293.69 current US$
in 2020
Mauritania rank
15th
Papua New Guinea rank
16th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Mauritania
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 396.54 current US$ against 293.69 current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 102.85 current US$.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.4 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Mauritania ranks 15th and Papua New Guinea ranks 16th of 55 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 656.77 current US$ 1,709 current US$ 1,052 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 426.01 current US$ 633.3 current US$ 207.29 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 396.54 current US$ 293.69 current US$ 102.85 current US$ Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Mauritania or Papua New Guinea?
Mauritania, at 396.54 current US$ against 293.69 current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Mauritania and Papua New Guinea?
102.85 current US$, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Papua New Guinea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Mauritania and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Mauritania ranks 15th and Papua New Guinea ranks 16th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/mauritania/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/mauritania/papua-new-guinea/">Mauritania vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed