Australia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Australia
1,873 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
954.27 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
5th
Zambia rank
7th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Australia
  • Zambia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1,873 current US$ against 954.27 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 918.73 current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 2.0 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 7th of 55 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 302.32 current US$ 249.88 current US$ 52.43 current US$ Australia
2000s 1,265 current US$ 1,315 current US$ 50.33 current US$ Zambia
2010s 2,515 current US$ 1,957 current US$ 558.02 current US$ Australia
2020s 1,873 current US$ 954.27 current US$ 918.59 current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Australia or Zambia?
Australia, at 1,873 current US$ against 954.27 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Australia and Zambia?
918.73 current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Australia ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 7th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/australia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/australia/zambia/">Australia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed