Australia vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Australia
1,873 current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
2,089 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
5th
Kazakhstan rank
4th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 2,089 current US$ against 1,873 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 216 current US$.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 4th of 55 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 302.32 current US$ 172.85 current US$ 129.47 current US$ Australia
2000s 1,265 current US$ 1,447 current US$ 182.58 current US$ Kazakhstan
2010s 2,515 current US$ 1,570 current US$ 944.89 current US$ Australia
2020s 1,873 current US$ 2,089 current US$ 215.88 current US$ Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 2,089 current US$ against 1,873 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Australia and Kazakhstan?
216 current US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Australia ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 4th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-current-us/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,195 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed