Australia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt

Australia
0.006 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
0.0058 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
5th
Russian Federation rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt over time

  • Australia
  • Russian Federation
00.0020.0040.0060.008199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.006 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.0058 real chained 2019 US$ in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0002 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0028 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0032 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0004 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation
2000s 0.0077 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0056 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0021 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2010s 0.0055 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0058 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0003 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation
2020s 0.006 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0058 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0002 real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt, Australia or Russian Federation?
Australia, at 0.006 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.0058 real chained 2019 US$ in Russian Federation as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt between Australia and Russian Federation?
0.0002 real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Russian Federation rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt?
Australia ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-cobalt-real-chained-2019-us/australia/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-cobalt-real-chained-2019-us/australia/russian-federation/">Australia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: cobalt (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed