Guinea vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite

Guinea
1,248 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
253.46 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
2nd
Montenegro rank
5th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time

  • Guinea
  • Montenegro
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 1,248 real chained 2019 US$ against 253.46 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 994.54 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea's figure about 4.9 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 2nd and Montenegro ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,685 real chained 2019 US$ 266.81 real chained 2019 US$ 1,418 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2010s 1,288 real chained 2019 US$ 260.63 real chained 2019 US$ 1,027 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2020s 1,248 real chained 2019 US$ 253.46 real chained 2019 US$ 994.06 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Guinea or Montenegro?
Guinea, at 1,248 real chained 2019 US$ against 253.46 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Guinea and Montenegro?
994.54 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Guinea and Montenegro rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
Guinea ranks 2nd and Montenegro ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/montenegro/">Guinea vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,651 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed