Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite

Bosnia and Herzegovina
63.41 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
43.5 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
6th
Kazakhstan rank
8th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kazakhstan
406080100120199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 63.41 real chained 2019 US$ against 43.5 real chained 2019 US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 19.91 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 6th and Kazakhstan ranks 8th of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 60.25 real chained 2019 US$ 125.27 real chained 2019 US$ 65.02 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2000s 57.69 real chained 2019 US$ 120.02 real chained 2019 US$ 62.34 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2010s 61.68 real chained 2019 US$ 46.76 real chained 2019 US$ 14.91 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 63.41 real chained 2019 US$ 43.5 real chained 2019 US$ 19.91 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 63.41 real chained 2019 US$ against 43.5 real chained 2019 US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
19.91 real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 6th and Kazakhstan ranks 8th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,651 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed