Montenegro vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite
Montenegro
115.21 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
65.58 current US$
in 2015
Montenegro rank
6th
Suriname rank
7th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- Montenegro
- Suriname
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 115.21 current US$ against 65.58 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 49.63 current US$.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.8 times Suriname's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 6th and Suriname ranks 7th of 32 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 201.8 current US$ | 1,948 current US$ | 1,746 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 24.68 current US$ | 595.9 current US$ | 571.22 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Montenegro or Suriname?
- Montenegro, at 115.21 current US$ against 65.58 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Montenegro and Suriname?
- 49.63 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Suriname?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Montenegro and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- Montenegro ranks 6th and Suriname ranks 7th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.