Mexico vs Mozambique: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite
Mexico
0.1308 current US$
in 2012
Mozambique
0.0236 current US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
24th
Mozambique rank
27th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- Mexico
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0.1308 current US$ against 0.0236 current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 0.1072 current US$.
That makes Mexico's figure about 5.5 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mexico ranks 24th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 32 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0403 current US$ | 0.0748 current US$ | 0.0346 current US$ | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.0649 current US$ | 0.0863 current US$ | 0.0214 current US$ | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Mexico or Mozambique?
- Mexico, at 0.1308 current US$ against 0.0236 current US$ in Mozambique as of 2012.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Mexico and Mozambique?
- 0.1072 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Mozambique?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Mexico and Mozambique rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- Mexico ranks 24th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.