Guyana vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite
Guyana
359.57 current US$
in 2016
Montenegro
115.21 current US$
in 2020
Guyana rank
4th
Montenegro rank
6th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- Guyana
- Montenegro
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 359.57 current US$ against 115.21 current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 244.36 current US$.
That makes Guyana's figure about 3.1 times Montenegro's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 4th and Montenegro ranks 6th of 32 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 955.56 current US$ | 201.8 current US$ | 753.76 current US$ | Guyana |
| 2010s | 543.48 current US$ | 20.69 current US$ | 522.79 current US$ | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Guyana or Montenegro?
- Guyana, at 359.57 current US$ against 115.21 current US$ in Montenegro as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Guyana and Montenegro?
- 244.36 current US$, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Guyana and Montenegro rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- Guyana ranks 4th and Montenegro ranks 6th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.