Colombia vs Mozambique: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite
Colombia
0.0148 current US$
in 2020
Mozambique
0.0236 current US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
29th
Mozambique rank
27th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- Colombia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.0236 current US$ against 0.0148 current US$ in Colombia, a difference of 0.0088 current US$.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.6 times Colombia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 32 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0088 current US$ | 0.026 current US$ | 0.0171 current US$ | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0.0148 current US$ | 0.0236 current US$ | 0.0088 current US$ | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Colombia or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 0.0236 current US$ against 0.0148 current US$ in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Colombia and Mozambique?
- 0.0088 current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mozambique?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mozambique rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- Colombia ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.