China vs India: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite
China
1.81 current US$
in 2020
India
2.68 current US$
in 2020
China rank
18th
India rank
17th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- China
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 2.68 current US$ against 1.81 current US$ in China, a difference of 0.87 current US$.
That makes India's figure about 1.5 times China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was India ahead.
China ranks 18th and India ranks 17th of 32 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6688 current US$ | 1.59 current US$ | 0.9254 current US$ | India |
| 2000s | 1.74 current US$ | 2.76 current US$ | 1.02 current US$ | India |
| 2010s | 2.55 current US$ | 3.49 current US$ | 0.94 current US$ | India |
| 2020s | 1.81 current US$ | 2.68 current US$ | 0.8695 current US$ | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, China or India?
- India, at 2.68 current US$ against 1.81 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between China and India?
- 0.87 current US$, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and India?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and India rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- China ranks 18th and India ranks 17th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.