Brazil vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite
Brazil
6.5 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
7.87 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Saudi Arabia rank
11th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time
- Brazil
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 7.87 current US$ against 6.5 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 1.37 current US$.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 32 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.06 current US$ | 6.26 current US$ | 8.8 current US$ | Brazil |
| 2020s | 6.5 current US$ | 7.87 current US$ | 1.37 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Brazil or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 7.87 current US$ against 6.5 current US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Brazil and Saudi Arabia?
- 1.37 current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Saudi Arabia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.