Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite

Bosnia and Herzegovina
25.76 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
65.58 current US$
in 2015
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
8th
Suriname rank
7th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Suriname
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 65.58 current US$ against 25.76 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 39.82 current US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 8th and Suriname ranks 7th of 32 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 1.92 current US$ 604.06 current US$ 602.14 current US$ Suriname
2000s 26.4 current US$ 968.89 current US$ 942.48 current US$ Suriname
2010s 29.47 current US$ 631.9 current US$ 602.43 current US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Suriname?
Suriname, at 65.58 current US$ against 25.76 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2015.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
39.82 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 8th and Suriname ranks 7th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/suriname/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
32 places, 673 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed