Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite

Bosnia and Herzegovina
25.76 current US$
in 2020
Montenegro
115.21 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
8th
Montenegro rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Montenegro
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 115.21 current US$ against 25.76 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 89.45 current US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 4.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 8th and Montenegro ranks 6th of 32 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 50.91 current US$ 201.8 current US$ 150.89 current US$ Montenegro
2010s 27.81 current US$ 71.33 current US$ 43.52 current US$ Montenegro
2020s 25.76 current US$ 115.21 current US$ 89.45 current US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 115.21 current US$ against 25.76 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro?
89.45 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 8th and Montenegro ranks 6th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/montenegro/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
32 places, 673 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed