Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite

Bosnia and Herzegovina
25.76 current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
15.24 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
8th
Kazakhstan rank
10th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kazakhstan
0255075100125199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 25.76 current US$ against 15.24 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 10.52 current US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.7 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 32 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.92 current US$ 21.93 current US$ 20.01 current US$ Kazakhstan
2000s 26.4 current US$ 38.69 current US$ 12.28 current US$ Kazakhstan
2010s 30.04 current US$ 29.9 current US$ 0.1427 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 25.76 current US$ 15.24 current US$ 10.53 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 25.76 current US$ against 15.24 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
10.52 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
22 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-bauxite-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: bauxite (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
32 places, 673 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed