Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Romania
84.05 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
90.99 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Romania rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Romania
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 90.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 84.05 real chained 2019 US$ in Romania, a difference of 6.94 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 810.61 real chained 2019 US$ 182.73 real chained 2019 US$ 627.88 real chained 2019 US$ Romania
2000s 259.62 real chained 2019 US$ 121.66 real chained 2019 US$ 137.96 real chained 2019 US$ Romania
2010s 77.31 real chained 2019 US$ 101.65 real chained 2019 US$ 24.34 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 84.05 real chained 2019 US$ 90.99 real chained 2019 US$ 6.94 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Romania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 90.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 84.05 real chained 2019 US$ in Romania as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Romania and Zimbabwe?
6.94 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Romania ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/romania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/romania/zimbabwe/">Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.