Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Kyrgyzstan
127.5 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ukraine
131.77 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
24th
Ukraine rank
23rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Ukraine
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 131.77 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.5 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.27 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 24th and Ukraine ranks 23rd of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Ukraine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 149.46 real chained 2019 US$ 115.28 real chained 2019 US$ 34.17 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 136.74 real chained 2019 US$ 121.56 real chained 2019 US$ 15.18 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 132.36 real chained 2019 US$ 127.98 real chained 2019 US$ 4.38 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 127.5 real chained 2019 US$ 131.77 real chained 2019 US$ 4.27 real chained 2019 US$ Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Kyrgyzstan or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 131.77 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.5 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
4.27 real chained 2019 US$, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 24th and Ukraine ranks 23rd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/ukraine/">Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.