Korea vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Korea
3.32 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Peru
3.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Korea rank
46th
Peru rank
45th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Korea
  • Peru
01020304050199520072020

How they compare

Peru currently reports 3.49 real chained 2019 US$ against 3.32 real chained 2019 US$ in Korea, a difference of 0.17 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Korea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 46th and Peru ranks 45th of 148 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 1.6 real chained 2019 US$ 47.72 real chained 2019 US$ 46.12 real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2000s 1.12 real chained 2019 US$ 23.83 real chained 2019 US$ 22.71 real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2010s 2.53 real chained 2019 US$ 2.89 real chained 2019 US$ 0.3624 real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2020s 3.32 real chained 2019 US$ 3.49 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1775 real chained 2019 US$ Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Korea or Peru?
Peru, at 3.49 real chained 2019 US$ against 3.32 real chained 2019 US$ in Korea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Korea and Peru?
0.17 real chained 2019 US$, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Peru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Korea and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Korea ranks 46th and Peru ranks 45th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/korea-rep/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/korea-rep/peru/">Korea vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.