Georgia vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Georgia
1.76 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
1.19 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
50th
Malawi rank
53rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Georgia
  • Malawi
00.511.522.5199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1.76 real chained 2019 US$ against 1.19 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi, a difference of 0.57 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.5 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malawi ahead.

Georgia ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 53rd of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 1.5 real chained 2019 US$ 2.18 real chained 2019 US$ 0.679 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 1.67 real chained 2019 US$ 1.79 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1217 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 1.75 real chained 2019 US$ 1.37 real chained 2019 US$ 0.383 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2020s 1.76 real chained 2019 US$ 1.19 real chained 2019 US$ 0.5685 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Georgia or Malawi?
Georgia, at 1.76 real chained 2019 US$ against 1.19 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Georgia and Malawi?
0.57 real chained 2019 US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Georgia ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 53rd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/malawi/">Georgia vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.