China vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

China
29.05 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
27.18 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
36th
Zambia rank
38th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • China
  • Zambia
020406080199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 29.05 real chained 2019 US$ against 27.18 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 1.87 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.

China ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 38th of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 43.63 real chained 2019 US$ 68.74 real chained 2019 US$ 25.11 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2000s 37.39 real chained 2019 US$ 15.14 real chained 2019 US$ 22.25 real chained 2019 US$ China
2010s 28.16 real chained 2019 US$ 21.29 real chained 2019 US$ 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 29.05 real chained 2019 US$ 27.18 real chained 2019 US$ 1.87 real chained 2019 US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, China or Zambia?
China, at 29.05 real chained 2019 US$ against 27.18 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between China and Zambia?
1.87 real chained 2019 US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
China ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 38th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/china/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/china/zambia/">China vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.