Chile vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Chile
28.79 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico
35.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
37th
Mexico rank
35th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
01020304050199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 35.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 28.79 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 7.13 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 37th and Mexico ranks 35th of 148 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 37.53 real chained 2019 US$ 48.28 real chained 2019 US$ 10.75 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 25.85 real chained 2019 US$ 43.04 real chained 2019 US$ 17.19 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 19.91 real chained 2019 US$ 37.77 real chained 2019 US$ 17.85 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2020s 28.79 real chained 2019 US$ 35.92 real chained 2019 US$ 7.13 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Chile or Mexico?
Mexico, at 35.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 28.79 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Chile and Mexico?
7.13 real chained 2019 US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Chile ranks 37th and Mexico ranks 35th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.