Canada vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Canada
844.69 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
1,041 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Canada rank
9th
Serbia rank
8th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Canada
  • Serbia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1,041 real chained 2019 US$ against 844.69 real chained 2019 US$ in Canada, a difference of 196.31 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 8th of 148 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 962.77 real chained 2019 US$ 1,794 real chained 2019 US$ 831.71 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 896.9 real chained 2019 US$ 1,325 real chained 2019 US$ 427.99 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 844.69 real chained 2019 US$ 1,041 real chained 2019 US$ 196.71 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Canada or Serbia?
Serbia, at 1,041 real chained 2019 US$ against 844.69 real chained 2019 US$ in Canada as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Canada and Serbia?
196.31 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Canada and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Canada ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 8th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/canada/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/canada/serbia/">Canada vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.