Canada vs Indonesia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Canada
844.69 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Indonesia
1,266 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Canada rank
9th
Indonesia rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Canada
  • Indonesia
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1,266 real chained 2019 US$ against 844.69 real chained 2019 US$ in Canada, a difference of 421.31 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.5 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 9th and Indonesia ranks 6th of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Indonesia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ 933.77 real chained 2019 US$ 465.24 real chained 2019 US$ Canada
2000s 1,026 real chained 2019 US$ 192.79 real chained 2019 US$ 832.82 real chained 2019 US$ Canada
2010s 896.9 real chained 2019 US$ 934.89 real chained 2019 US$ 37.98 real chained 2019 US$ Indonesia
2020s 844.69 real chained 2019 US$ 1,266 real chained 2019 US$ 421.15 real chained 2019 US$ Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Canada or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 1,266 real chained 2019 US$ against 844.69 real chained 2019 US$ in Canada as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Canada and Indonesia?
421.31 real chained 2019 US$, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Indonesia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Canada and Indonesia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Canada ranks 9th and Indonesia ranks 6th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Indonesia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/canada/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/canada/indonesia/">Canada vs Indonesia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.