Botswana vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Botswana
515.5 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
670.67 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
14th
Montenegro rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Botswana
  • Montenegro
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 670.67 real chained 2019 US$ against 515.5 real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana, a difference of 155.17 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 14th and Montenegro ranks 11th of 148 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 15.66 real chained 2019 US$ 675.7 real chained 2019 US$ 660.03 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro
2010s 117.15 real chained 2019 US$ 666.68 real chained 2019 US$ 549.54 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro
2020s 515.5 real chained 2019 US$ 670.67 real chained 2019 US$ 155.16 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Botswana or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 670.67 real chained 2019 US$ against 515.5 real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Botswana and Montenegro?
155.17 real chained 2019 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Botswana ranks 14th and Montenegro ranks 11th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/botswana/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/botswana/montenegro/">Botswana vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.