Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1,079 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
1,953 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
7th
Russian Federation rank
4th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Russian Federation
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1,953 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,079 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 874 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.8 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 7th and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 148 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 1,166 real chained 2019 US$ 1,865 real chained 2019 US$ 698.79 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation
2000s 1,117 real chained 2019 US$ 1,908 real chained 2019 US$ 790.84 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation
2010s 1,105 real chained 2019 US$ 1,934 real chained 2019 US$ 829.5 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation
2020s 1,079 real chained 2019 US$ 1,953 real chained 2019 US$ 873.35 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 1,953 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,079 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian Federation?
874 real chained 2019 US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian Federation rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 7th and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/russian-federation/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.