Armenia vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Armenia
0.0064 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Norway
0.2885 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Armenia rank
59th
Norway rank
56th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Armenia
  • Norway
00.511.5199520072020

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.2885 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.0064 real chained 2019 US$ in Armenia, a difference of 0.2821 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Norway's figure about 45.1 times Armenia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 59th and Norway ranks 56th of 148 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0055 real chained 2019 US$ 0.7998 real chained 2019 US$ 0.7944 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2000s 0.0059 real chained 2019 US$ 0.8237 real chained 2019 US$ 0.8178 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2010s 0.0062 real chained 2019 US$ 0.3352 real chained 2019 US$ 0.329 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2020s 0.0064 real chained 2019 US$ 0.2885 real chained 2019 US$ 0.2821 real chained 2019 US$ Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Armenia or Norway?
Norway, at 0.2885 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.0064 real chained 2019 US$ in Armenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Armenia and Norway?
0.2821 real chained 2019 US$, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Norway?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Norway rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Armenia ranks 59th and Norway ranks 56th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/armenia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-coal-real-chained-2019-us/armenia/norway/">Armenia vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.