United Kingdom vs Uruguay: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
United Kingdom
0 current US$
in 2020
Uruguay
0 current US$
in 2020
United Kingdom rank
50th
Uruguay rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- United Kingdom
- Uruguay
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was United Kingdom ahead.
United Kingdom ranks 50th and Uruguay ranks 50th of 151 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.257 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0.257 current US$ | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 55.27 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 55.27 current US$ | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 38.42 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 38.42 current US$ | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, United Kingdom or Uruguay?
- United Kingdom, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between United Kingdom and Uruguay?
- 0 current US$, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Uruguay?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do United Kingdom and Uruguay rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- United Kingdom ranks 50th and Uruguay ranks 50th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.