Spain vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Spain
0 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
0 current US$
in 2020
Spain rank
50th
Suriname rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Spain
- Suriname
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 50th and Suriname ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.69 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 57.69 current US$ | Spain |
| 2010s | 26.72 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 26.72 current US$ | Spain |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Spain or Suriname?
- Spain, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Spain and Suriname?
- 0 current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Spain and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Spain ranks 50th and Suriname ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.