Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Romania
37.35 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
46.04 current US$
in 2020
Romania rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Romania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 46.04 current US$ against 37.35 current US$ in Romania, a difference of 8.69 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Romania ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.23 current US$ | 27.58 current US$ | 25.35 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 113.58 current US$ | 205.12 current US$ | 91.54 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 140.25 current US$ | 244.94 current US$ | 104.69 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 37.35 current US$ | 46.04 current US$ | 8.69 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Romania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 46.04 current US$ against 37.35 current US$ in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 8.69 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Romania ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.