Philippines vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Philippines
34.17 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
46.04 current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Philippines
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 46.04 current US$ against 34.17 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 11.87 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8387 current US$ | 27.58 current US$ | 26.74 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 15.32 current US$ | 205.12 current US$ | 189.8 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 55.14 current US$ | 244.94 current US$ | 189.81 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 34.17 current US$ | 46.04 current US$ | 11.87 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Philippines or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 46.04 current US$ against 34.17 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Philippines and Zimbabwe?
- 11.87 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Philippines ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.