Papua New Guinea vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Papua New Guinea
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
50th
Peru rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Peru
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 50th and Peru ranks 50th of 151 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 1.84 current US$ | 1.84 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 5.42 current US$ | 5.42 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Papua New Guinea or Peru?
- Papua New Guinea, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Papua New Guinea and Peru?
- 0 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 50th and Peru ranks 50th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.