Pakistan vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Pakistan
13.54 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
20.04 current US$
in 2020
Pakistan rank
33rd
Zambia rank
31st
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Pakistan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 20.04 current US$ against 13.54 current US$ in Pakistan, a difference of 6.5 current US$.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.5 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 31st of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.3 current US$ | 0.8192 current US$ | 0.4802 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 9.21 current US$ | 3.54 current US$ | 5.67 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 15.86 current US$ | 16.9 current US$ | 1.04 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 13.54 current US$ | 20.04 current US$ | 6.5 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Pakistan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 20.04 current US$ against 13.54 current US$ in Pakistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Pakistan and Zambia?
- 6.5 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Pakistan ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 31st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.