Hungary vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Hungary
67.81 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
46.04 current US$
in 2020
Hungary rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Hungary
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 67.81 current US$ against 46.04 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 21.77 current US$.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Hungary ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.06 current US$ | 27.58 current US$ | 22.52 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 169.88 current US$ | 205.12 current US$ | 35.24 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 201.42 current US$ | 244.94 current US$ | 43.53 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 67.81 current US$ | 46.04 current US$ | 21.77 current US$ | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Hungary or Zimbabwe?
- Hungary, at 67.81 current US$ against 46.04 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 21.77 current US$, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Hungary ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.