Georgia vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Georgia
7.68 current US$
in 2020
Pakistan
13.54 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
35th
Pakistan rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 13.54 current US$ against 7.68 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 5.86 current US$.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.8 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Pakistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 35th and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0491 current US$ | 1.3 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 2.65 current US$ | 9.21 current US$ | 6.56 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 29.62 current US$ | 15.86 current US$ | 13.77 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2020s | 7.68 current US$ | 13.54 current US$ | 5.86 current US$ | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Georgia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 13.54 current US$ against 7.68 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 5.86 current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Georgia ranks 35th and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.