Georgia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Georgia
7.68 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
6.82 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
35th
Mexico rank
36th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Georgia
- Mexico
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 7.68 current US$ against 6.82 current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 0.86 current US$.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 35th and Mexico ranks 36th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0491 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0.0491 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2000s | 2.65 current US$ | 20.11 current US$ | 17.46 current US$ | Mexico |
| 2010s | 29.62 current US$ | 45.21 current US$ | 15.59 current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 7.68 current US$ | 6.82 current US$ | 0.859 current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Georgia or Mexico?
- Georgia, at 7.68 current US$ against 6.82 current US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Georgia and Mexico?
- 0.86 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Georgia ranks 35th and Mexico ranks 36th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.